
The Core Essay Structure
-
Introduction: Set the Direction
-
Context (1–3 sentences)
-
A clear thesis statement (your main argument)
-
(Optional) a brief roadmap of main points
-
Body: Build the Argument
-
Conclusion: Reinforce (Don’t Expand)
-
Restate the thesis in new wording
-
Summarize the key moves (briefly)
-
End with an implication or final insight
Five Steps for Building a High-Scoring Outline
Step 1: Turn the prompt into a clear question
-
“Discuss X” → “What is my position on X, and why?”
-
“To what extent…” → “How far do I agree, and what evidence supports it?”
Step 2: Draft a usable thesis (not perfect—just clear)
-
Position + reasons X is true because A, B, and C.
-
Although X, Y because… Although X seems convincing, Y is more accurate because…
-
Problem → cause → solution X is a problem caused by A and B; therefore C is the best solution.
Step 3: Create 3–5 body headings (claims, not topics)
-
Topic: “Remote work”
-
Claim: “Remote work increases productivity by reducing commuting fatigue”
Step 4: Add evidence bullets under each heading
-
Study/data/quote/example
-
One line explaining what it shows
Step 5: Add a counterargument paragraph
-
Counterargument → rebuttal → return to thesis

Mini example: Outline you can actually write from
Prompt: Should universities require attendance? Thesis: Universities should not require attendance because it disadvantages working students, encourages passive learning, and can be replaced by performance-based assessment.Body 1 (Claim): Attendance rules disadvantage working students
Evidence: schedule conflicts + equity concerns Analysis: policy affects access → weaker academic fairnessBody 2 (Claim): Mandatory attendance encourages passive learning
Evidence: studies on autonomy/engagement (or course participation data) Analysis: presence ≠ learning; active methods matter moreBody 3 (Claim): Performance-based assessment is a better alternative
Evidence: grades reflect learning outcomes more accurately than seat time Analysis: aligns evaluation with skills and masteryCounterargument: Attendance builds discipline/community
Rebuttal: community can be built through active participation, not presenceConclusion: restate thesis + implications for inclusive policy
The Best Body Paragraph Structure
Most “weak essays” have the same issue: they include information but not enough reasoning. Use the TEAL (Topic sentence, Evidence, Analysis, Link) structure to maintain flow.
To make your transitions seamless, you can use specific essay transitions that guide the reader from one piece of evidence to the next.
Use TEAL (or PEEL)
-
Topic sentence: the paragraph’s main claim
-
Evidence: research, data, textual proof, or example
-
Analysis: explain how evidence supports your claim and thesis
-
Link: connect to the next paragraph
Evidence vs Analysis (The #1 Grade Booster)
-
Evidence = what the source shows
-
Analysis = what it means and how it proves your point
Mini example: TEAL paragraph (short but realistic)
Topic sentence: Mandatory attendance policies disadvantage working students and reduce educational equity. Evidence: Many students work part-time or full-time to support tuition and living costs, making fixed attendance rules difficult to meet consistently. Analysis: When attendance is graded, the policy rewards schedule flexibility rather than learning—so students with jobs are penalized even if their assignments and exam performance demonstrate mastery. This shifts assessment away from academic outcomes and toward circumstances outside a student’s control, which weakens fairness. Link: For the same reason, policies focused on participation and performance are more equitable than seat-time requirements.
“Analysis prompts” to deepen your reasoning
-
So what? What does this show?
-
Why does it matter? How does it support the thesis?
-
Compared to what? Are there limitations or counterexamples?
Four Types Essay Structure
Argumentative Essay Structure
-
Introduction + thesis
-
Reason 1 (TEAL)
-
Reason 2 (TEAL)
-
Reason 3 (TEAL)
-
Counterargument → rebuttal
-
Conclusion
Compare & Contrast Structure
-
Discuss all points about A → then all points about B Best for shorter essays.
-
Compare one dimension per paragraph (cost, effectiveness, ethics, etc.) Best for clarity and smoother flow.
Problem–Solution Structure
-
Define the problem + significance
-
Explain causes (1–3 paragraphs)
-
Present solution(s) + evidence
-
Evaluate feasibility/limitations
-
Conclusion
Research-Based / Literature-Based Writing (For Researchers)
-
Theme 1: main debate + evidence + your synthesis
-
Theme 2: main debate + evidence + your synthesis
-
Theme 3: gap/limitation + your interpretation
-
Conclusion: implications + future direction
Structure by Word Count (500–5000+)
500–800 words
-
Intro (1) + Body (2–3) + Conclusion (1)
1000–1500 words
-
Intro (1) + Body (3–4) + Conclusion (1)
-
Optional: 1 counterargument paragraph
2000–3000 words
-
Intro (1) + Body (4–6) + Conclusion (1)
-
Consider headings if allowed
5000+ words (research-heavy)
-
Section-based structure often works better than “pure paragraphs”
-
Use headings like: Background, Themes/Arguments, Discussion, Implications
Fix a Messy Draft: The 60-Second Structure Check
-
One-sentence summary test
-
If you can’t summarize it, the paragraph is unfocused.
-
If two summaries are basically the same, you’re repeating yourself.
-
Thesis alignment test
-
Order test (rearrange for logic)
-
Conclusion test
-
New evidence
-
New arguments
-
New sources If the conclusion introduces something new, move it into the body.
Literature Review Structure (2026)
Step 1: Group sources into themes
-
agreement vs disagreement
-
method differences
-
definitions or theoretical frameworks
-
contexts (countries, populations, time periods)
Step 2: Build each theme paragraph like an argument
-
What do scholars agree on?
-
Where do they disagree, and why?
-
What does the evidence suggest overall?
-
What is your synthesis (your academic “take”)?
Step 3: Use synthesis sentence starters (copy/paste)
-
Taken together, these studies suggest that…
-
However, findings diverge when…
-
A key limitation across this literature is…
-
This debate highlights the need to…
-
In contrast to earlier work, recent evidence indicates…
-
One explanation for these mixed results is…
Leveraging Smart Tools to Build Structure
Scenario 1: Prompt → Outline in minutes
Scenario 2: Thesis alignment (stay on-topic)

Scenario 3: Fix flow in an existing draft
Final Checklist (Before You Submit)
-
My thesis is one clear, arguable sentence
-
Every paragraph supports the thesis (one idea per paragraph)
-
I include evidence and analysis (not summary-only writing)
-
Paragraphs connect logically with transitions
-
The conclusion reinforces the argument without adding new points




